summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/htdocs/docs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorville <ville@localhost>2002-09-08 19:37:42 +0000
committerville <ville@localhost>2002-09-08 19:37:42 +0000
commitba68ea2d990ee9d40578bf5ae35922cb66555794 (patch)
treea301452204c8a9cd79010cb1eeef2243b60e6365 /htdocs/docs
parentc2bd4346d5daf794955a002900fb19fe8d693047 (diff)
downloadmarkup-validator-ba68ea2d990ee9d40578bf5ae35922cb66555794.zip
markup-validator-ba68ea2d990ee9d40578bf5ae35922cb66555794.tar.gz
markup-validator-ba68ea2d990ee9d40578bf5ae35922cb66555794.tar.bz2
Speling fixxes :)
Diffstat (limited to 'htdocs/docs')
-rwxr-xr-xhtdocs/docs/devel.html10
-rwxr-xr-xhtdocs/docs/errors.html16
-rwxr-xr-xhtdocs/docs/sgml.html6
-rwxr-xr-xhtdocs/docs/users.html24
-rwxr-xr-xhtdocs/docs/why.html10
5 files changed, 33 insertions, 33 deletions
diff --git a/htdocs/docs/devel.html b/htdocs/docs/devel.html
index b52aa04..e60b08d 100755
--- a/htdocs/docs/devel.html
+++ b/htdocs/docs/devel.html
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-<!--#set var="revision" value="\$Id: devel.html,v 1.6 2002-08-20 01:51:24 link Exp $"
---><!--#set var="date" value="\$Date: 2002-08-20 01:51:24 $"
+<!--#set var="revision" value="\$Id: devel.html,v 1.7 2002-09-08 19:37:42 ville Exp $"
+--><!--#set var="date" value="\$Date: 2002-09-08 19:37:42 $"
--><!--#set var="title" value="Developer Documentation for The W3C HTML Validation Service"
--><!--#set var="relroot" value="../"
--><!--#include virtual="../header.html" -->
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
relies on a moderately large set of Perl modules for it's operation.
</p>
<p>
- This document tries to draw a roadmap of the prerequisits and what the
+ This document tries to draw a road map of the prerequisites and what the
different parts of the system do. It is intended for system
administrators and people interested in helping developing the validator.
This is not end user documentation. See the
@@ -40,12 +40,12 @@
for the "check" CGI script. There is a bunch of lines that of the form
"use Foo::Bar" where each "Foo::Bar" represents a module. Most modules
can be found on <a href="http://www.cpan.org/">CPAN</a>. The following
- list was complete when CVS spit out: <code>$Date: 2002-08-20 01:51:24 $</code>. <tt>:-)</tt>
+ list was complete when CVS spit out: <code>$Date: 2002-09-08 19:37:42 $</code>. <tt>:-)</tt>
</p>
<dl>
<dt><code>LWP::UserAgent</code></dt>
<dd>
- Gisle Aas« most excellent WWW library for Perl. This is where our
+ Gisle Aas' most excellent WWW library for Perl. This is where our
support for downloading pages off the net comes from.
</dd>
<dt><code>URI::Escape</code></dt>
diff --git a/htdocs/docs/errors.html b/htdocs/docs/errors.html
index 5a47355..7ec1c90 100755
--- a/htdocs/docs/errors.html
+++ b/htdocs/docs/errors.html
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-<!--#set var="revision" value="\$Id: errors.html,v 1.18 2002-08-20 01:51:24 link Exp $"
---><!--#set var="date" value="\$Date: 2002-08-20 01:51:24 $"
+<!--#set var="revision" value="\$Id: errors.html,v 1.19 2002-09-08 19:37:42 ville Exp $"
+--><!--#set var="date" value="\$Date: 2002-09-08 19:37:42 $"
--><!--#set var="title" value="Error Explanations for The W3C HTML Validation Service"
--><!--#set var="relroot" value="../"
--><!--#include virtual="../header.html" -->
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
as case-sensitive, they must still be case-insensitive unique in the
document. See
<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/links.html#h-12.2.1">Section
- 12.2.1 Syntax of anchor names</a> in the HTML 4.01 Reccomendation
+ 12.2.1 Syntax of anchor names</a> in the HTML 4.01 Recommendation
for further information.
</p>
</dd>
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
You have an attribute whose value needs to be in quotes. If an
attribute value contains any character other than letters, digits,
hyphens and periods, it must be enclosed in double quotes (single
- quotes would also be okay from an <a href="sgml.html#sgml">SGML</a>
+ quotes would also be OK from an <a href="sgml.html#sgml">SGML</a>
standpoint, but some browsers don't recognize them).
</p>
</dd>
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@
You left off a required attribute of the indicated element. The most
common such omitted attribute is the <code>ALT</code> attribute of the
<code>AREA</code> or <code>IMG</code> element; browsers will typically
- use these to build a menu equivalent to your client-side imagemap if
+ use these to build a menu equivalent to your client-side image map if
the user has disabled image loading, so you'll want to use a
meaningful value here.
</p>
@@ -529,7 +529,7 @@
<p>
The document contained an UTF-8 encoded Unicode Byte Order Mark (BOM)
as the first character and we have removed it before parsing.
- Many XML Processors fail to recognize it (allthough it's perfectly
+ Many XML Processors fail to recognize it (although it's perfectly
valid). To be on the safe side you may want to avoid using the
BOM in UTF-8 encoded documents until browsers are updated to support it.
</p>
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@
<p>
An attribute was specified to contain one of a set of predefined
values and you have used a value that is not in that set. The error
- message tells which attribute value was unknonw and the possible
+ message tells which attribute value was unknown and the possible
legal values for this attribute.
</p>
</dd>
@@ -611,7 +611,7 @@
The referenced element &lsquo;<var>FOO</var>&rsquo; isn't allowed in the context it occurs
in, but it would be if it was wrapped in a &lsquo;<var>BAR</var>&rsquo; element. The
Validator has assumed that you have forgotten to add a &lsquo;<var>BAR</var>&rsquo;
- starttag and continued validation as if it was there. You should
+ start tag and continued validation as if it was there. You should
check if this is the case and insert the proper tag.
</p>
</dd>
diff --git a/htdocs/docs/sgml.html b/htdocs/docs/sgml.html
index fa85ee1..10b518c 100755
--- a/htdocs/docs/sgml.html
+++ b/htdocs/docs/sgml.html
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-<!--#set var="revision" value="\$Id: sgml.html,v 1.9 2002-08-20 01:51:24 link Exp $"
---><!--#set var="date" value="\$Date: 2002-08-20 01:51:24 $"
+<!--#set var="revision" value="\$Id: sgml.html,v 1.10 2002-09-08 19:37:42 ville Exp $"
+--><!--#set var="date" value="\$Date: 2002-09-08 19:37:42 $"
--><!--#set var="title" value="Introduction To SGML for The W3C HTML Validation Service"
--><!--#set var="relroot" value="../"
--><!--#include virtual="../header.html" -->
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
<p>
For our purposes, a DTD, or Document Type Definition, is simply a file
that defines the syntax of a <a href="#sgml">SGML</a>-based language.
- The DTD's for
+ The DTDs for
<a href="http://w3.org/MarkUp/html-spec/">HTML 2.0</a>
and <a href="http://w3.org/TR/REC-html32">HTML 3.2</a>
were written by the HTML Working Group of the
diff --git a/htdocs/docs/users.html b/htdocs/docs/users.html
index 0479887..eb95f34 100755
--- a/htdocs/docs/users.html
+++ b/htdocs/docs/users.html
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
-<!--#set var="revision" value="\$Id: users.html,v 1.6 2002-08-20 01:51:24 link Exp $"
---><!--#set var="date" value="\$Date: 2002-08-20 01:51:24 $"
+<!--#set var="revision" value="\$Id: users.html,v 1.7 2002-09-08 19:37:42 ville Exp $"
+--><!--#set var="date" value="\$Date: 2002-09-08 19:37:42 $"
--><!--#set var="title" value="User Documentation for The W3C HTML Validation Service"
--><!--#set var="relroot" value="../"
--><!--#include virtual="../header.html" -->
<div id="Quickstart">
- <h2 id="skip">QuickStart</h2>
+ <h2 id="skip">Quick Start</h2>
<p>
Just type (or Cut&amp;Paste) the URL for the page you want to validate
into the text field on the form and press the "Validate this page"
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
</p>
<p>
If you have a local file you want to validate, choose the "File Upload"
- link from the navigation menu. Select the button labelled "Browse..."
+ link from the navigation menu. Select the button labeled "Browse..."
(or something like that, depending on your browser) and choose the file
you want to upload in the usual manner for your OS.
</p>
@@ -27,9 +27,9 @@
objective syntax rules called a "DTD", a Document Type Definition. This
way you can be sure your HTML is really valid and not just that it
conforms to some random programmer's idea of "nice" HTML. Note that
- valid HTML does not guarantee that your pages will work ok in all
- browsers. Most of them are severly broken and you may need to find
- alternate ways of achieveing your goal.
+ valid HTML does not guarantee that your pages will work OK in all
+ browsers. Most of them are severely broken and you may need to find
+ alternate ways of achieving your goal.
</p>
<p>
When you send an URL to the W3C HTML Validation Service, it will fetch
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
constructs.
</dd>
<dt>exclude attributes from the parse tree (<code>noatt</code>)</dt>
- <dd>Supress attributes from the parse tree to make it more readable.</dd>
+ <dd>Suppress attributes from the parse tree to make it more readable.</dd>
</dl>
</div>
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
You can link directly to the Validator home page, or you can call the
Validator CGI program. The home page is &lt;URL:<a
href="http://validator.w3.org/">http://validator.w3.org/</a>&gt; at
- the moment (and for the forseeable future) and the CGI program can be
+ the moment (and for the foreseeable future) and the CGI program can be
reached at &lt;URL:<a
href="http://validator.w3.org/check">http://validator.w3.org/check</a>&gt;.
</p>
@@ -101,14 +101,14 @@
</p>
<p>
The various options are listed above in the section
- "<a href="#Options">The Options</a>" in paranthesis after the long
+ "<a href="#Options">The Options</a>" in parenthesis after the long
name. To add options to your links directly, append the options
separated by a semi-colon. For example &lt;URL:<a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.example.com/;ss;outline;sp">http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.example.com/;ss;outline;sp</a>&gt;
will validate the example.com home page with "Show Source", "Outline" and
"Show Parse Tree" on, but "Exclude Attributes" off.
</p>
<p>
- You may also see these separated by amperstands and equal-signs, but
+ You may also see these separated by ampersands and equal-signs, but
this usage is deprecated and support may be removed at some time in the
future.
</p>
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
average HTML document. We're working on ways to make the error messages
more friendly, but for now feel free to email the
<a href="mailto:www-validator@w3.org">www-validator@w3.org</a>
- mailinglist if you need help interpreting the results. This will have
+ mailing list if you need help interpreting the results. This will have
the added benefit of letting us know which error messages are causing
the most trouble so we can fix those first. Please be as specific as
possible and include the <em>exact</em> error message and, preferably, an URL
diff --git a/htdocs/docs/why.html b/htdocs/docs/why.html
index 672aeaf..5ae8c3c 100755
--- a/htdocs/docs/why.html
+++ b/htdocs/docs/why.html
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-<!--#set var="revision" value="\$Id: why.html,v 1.4 2002-08-20 01:51:24 link Exp $"
---><!--#set var="date" value="\$Date: 2002-08-20 01:51:24 $"
+<!--#set var="revision" value="\$Id: why.html,v 1.5 2002-09-08 19:37:42 ville Exp $"
+--><!--#set var="date" value="\$Date: 2002-09-08 19:37:42 $"
--><!--#set var="title" value="Why Validate?"
--><!--#set var="relroot" value="../"
--><!--#include virtual="../header.html" -->
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
<p>
This document attempts to answer the questions many people have
regarding <em>why</em> they should bother with Validating their
- web sites and tries to dispell a few common myths.
+ web sites and tries to dispel a few common myths.
</p>
<p>
The original version was written by
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
<a href="http://www.w3.org/">World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)</a>
for HTML and XML-derived Web document types, or by the
<a href="http://www.wapforum.org/">WapForum</a> for WML, etc. It
- serves a similar purpose to spellchecking and proofreading for grammar
+ serves a similar purpose to spell checking and proofreading for grammar
and syntax, but is much more precise and reliable than any of those
processes because it is dealing with precisely-specified machine
languages, not with nebulously-defined human natural language.
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@
</p>
<p>
It is perfectly in order for authors to express their creativity on
- the Web, though it is of course generally more approriate to some
+ the Web, though it is of course generally more appropriate to some
sites (e.g. recreational ones) than to others (e.g. informational
or functional sites like this one). But authors with creative
ambitions should bear in mind that in any artistic field, you